قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / What would television and social media be like if Trump declared an early victory?

What would television and social media be like if Trump declared an early victory?



The scenario – undemocratic and unthinkable in the past but a very real possibility as Trump seeks to stay in power – is causing the media and tech executives to debate the reactions potential.

As for the major television networks, one question is paramount: will they broadcast Trump live if he is making a speech and making statements purely speculative?

The short answer is yes. Although network operators were reluctant to speak openly about such a hypothetical and disturbing scenario, five people on different networks reported on condition of anonymity that they fully expected comments from The President on Election Night will be shown live.

Any early statements by the President ̵

1; or Joe Biden, on the matter, though, with no equivalent fear of that happening, will however be wrapped up in the television scene, with those Powerful editing and visual proof that the race is too close to calling.

A plan described publicly by NBC News president Noah Oppenheim was reiterated by leaders at other networks, including CNN.

“We were actively prepared to physically test any attempt by anyone to distort the status of the race or the outcome of the race,” Oppenheim told The Hollywood Reporter.

But is that enough? The Trump era has raised unusual questions about the morality of broadcasting and repeated serious political lies.

“I think there’s a very difficult decision for the networks to get Trump live on election night, especially if you know he’s going to go out and lie and spread dangerous misinformation about election, “MSNBC host Chris Hayes tweeted on Sunday amid news reports of the possibility of declaring an early victory.

On Monday, an MSNBC spokesperson declined to comment on how it might handle such a situation.

The question arises: Do the networks act as gatekeepers and refuse to broadcast Trump’s unfiltered statements to tens of millions of Americans, or their role is to display news as it does? happening?

Many liberals believe that American networks are guilty of broadcasting too much false information about Trump too often. By contrast, many conservatives believe that networks other than Fox News have exercised too much restraint.

Inside the newsrooms, a common answer to this predicament was simply, “he’s the president.” The belief that an elected leader’s words are trustworthy, even when wrong, and must be heard, then fact checked if necessary.

ABC News team leader George Stephanopoulos alluded to this point in an interview with The New York Times on Election Night: “I don’t think we can censor the candidates,” he said. . “But we have to be wary about placing any comment made in context, with all we know about the position of the race, the position of the law, the position of the ballot.”

That appears to be a consensus in major networks, though some employees are provoking tougher stances toward Trump, based on his history of deceitful speeches.

An unnamed industry source outlined a possible scenario in which networks opt out of Trump live broadcast: If violence spreads and newsroom leaders have reason to believe Trump will put gasoline on the fire.

Responding to a question about the possibility of an early victory, a CBS News spokesman said, “we will report the candidate’s statement, however, we will only make a prediction based on data. Data and model statistics of our Decision Department. “

On CNN’s “Trusted Sources” Sunday morning, Sam Feist, CNN Washington office director, said information on the election would be based on data.

“Once you start counting and reporting the number of votes, the spin and the time the shoot ends,” he said. “On election night, we’ll talk a lot about numbers. We’ll look in great detail at the numbers, where the ballots come from, how many of them are the early mail ballots, Ballots on Election Day. But we’re not going to spend a lot of time paying attention to the turnaround. We’re really going to focus on the data. “

Feist and other experts have stressed that election predictions could take longer this year due to the pandemic and a large increase in the number of mailed ballots. “Just because taking more time doesn’t mean anything is wrong. And we all have to remember that,” he said.

But there are concerns that Trump will embrace possible delays to shape public opinion – and announce that he has been re-elected.

Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter said they would take signals from major networks and The Associated Press.

Both Twitter and Facebook said on Monday that they would be relying on predictions on the decision table made by the major networks and The Associated Press.

Twitter says it can apply warning labels to candidates’ tweets, campaigns and other conspicuous accounts attempting to declare victory before an official result is announced.

“Starting from election night until the end of the inauguration, we will label some Tweets that release the election results,” Twitter said in a blog post. “We will prioritize presidential elections and other stiff competitions where there can be serious problems with misinformation based on the criteria below.”

Facebook said that “if a presidential candidate or party declares an early victory before the race called for by the major media above”, the platform will “add more specific information in the label on the posts. candidate’s “and” add more specific information in the head-message section of the feed. “




Source link