قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Mueller investigated – but did not charge – Stone, WikiLeaks and Assange about the 2016 attack on the Russian Democrats, little recompiled report suggests

Mueller investigated – but did not charge – Stone, WikiLeaks and Assange about the 2016 attack on the Russian Democrats, little recompiled report suggests



The latest version of the report shows that Mueller considered whether Stone, a longtime relative of President Donald Trump, along with WikiLeaks and WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, should face charges of a criminal conspiracy. the involvement of the Russian government’s Democratic Party attack in 2016 or not the presidential election campaign. Ultimately Mueller decided there was not enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.

The latest version of the report is released because the transparent group’s Electronic Privacy Information Center has sued about it. The new version also reveals details about how the Russians specifically sought to harm Hillary Clinton and support Trump in 201

6.

Several Russians affiliated with the GRU military intelligence unit have been accused of attacking Democrats and leaking stolen emails, which shaped politics during the 2016 presidential race and created opportunities. for Trump’s campaign to attack Clinton. Separately, other Russians have been accused of running an extensive propaganda campaign on social media aimed at destabilizing US politics.

Mueller argued that Stone and Assange could be held responsible for the conspiracy to hack as they helped disseminate and maximize the impact of stolen documents. But in the end, Mueller writes, the Justice Department “has no acceptable evidence”, such as evidence of an agreement and knows that the hack is ongoing, to secure a conviction of the conspiracy.

Monday’s Mueller revelations add a new layer of nuance to an understanding of what the former FBI director found about the Trump campaign’s acceptability and Russia’s hacking and dumping of Democratic emails. Steal, note that Stone may be a more active player than previously believed.

During his discussion of a potential case against Stone, Mueller acknowledged “the existence of some evidence that Stone played a role in coordinating the October 7 release” of hacked emails. Clinton’s campaign president, John Podesta.

The report said Mueller’s team was unable to find evidence beyond a “plausible current” suspicion that Stone or other campaign advisers collaborated with WikiLeaks.

“Although the Office cannot rule out the possibility of a coordination between Stone and WikiLeaks or additional evidence might shed some light on that matter, the investigation has not yielded acceptable evidence capable of responding to that. the government’s responsibility to prove the truth establishes such coordination beyond a reasonable doubt, “the newly published section of the Mueller report said.

Stone was found guilty of lying to Congress, obstructing and intimidating witnesses about his attempt to reach WikiLeaks in 2016, even though he was able to avoid prison after receiving leniency from Trump. Assange faces charges in the US for plotting to hack, even though the case is unrelated to the 2016 election. Assange has yet to appear in US court and his lawyers have criticized the report. status and against his extradition from England to the US.

Mueller explains how his team faces additional hurdles in potential cases against WikiLeaks or Trump campaign affiliates.

“The office also looked at whether WikiLeaks and anyone associated with the Trump Campaign have a responsibility in connection with WikiLeaks releasing stolen emails and other documents lasting months, possibly with the the target influences the 2016 presidential election, “wrote Mueller.

But his team “concludes that there exist substantial questions about whether an email release can be considered ‘spend’, whether the government can establish willful intent, and whether traceability can be. Whether this behavioral element is subject to the protections of the First Amendment Combined, factors create enough doubt that the Office can acquire and maintain a “belief in WikiLeaks.”

“It’s not surprising that Mr. Mueller decided not to prosecute Julian Assange. No one has been charged in the United States for disclosing truthful information,” said Barry Pollack, Assange’s US defense attorney. foresee Mueller’s report on Monday.

And Grant Smith, Stone’s defense attorney, said the newly released version of the report vindicated Stone because he “had no way” in advance of the time or content of the emails the Russians hit. stolen and released.

“No matter how hard the Mueller team tried, they couldn’t make the case where they tried to pin Mr. Stone in the first place. These new unresponsive sections are filled with capitalization to draw conclusions. in the end that there was simply non-existent evidence for Stone involvement, ”Smith said.

Russians pay women to attend Trump rallies

Another piece of the report released on Monday clearly describes how Russians working on a widespread social media troll farm operation helped Trump win the presidency – with a the document instructs Russian propaganda to “take any opportunity to criticize Hillary.” [Clinton] and the rest (except Sanders and Trump – we support them), ”Mueller quoted.

Newly published descriptions of the troll farm, known as the Internet Research Agency, also describe how Russians seek to create social media accounts targeting politicians and public figures at home. America to generate more online responses.

The new publication also reveals a lot of evidence that Mueller has recorded about how the Internet Research Agency attempted to defame Clinton.

Among other tactics, the group “paid a Florida woman more than $ 1,000” to attend two Trump rallies dressed in a Clinton outfit and prison jumpsuit, part of the edited report. said back before.

Trump and Attorney General William Barr for months have been trying to question Mueller’s findings that the Russians support Trump and want to harm Clinton’s campaign. Instead, they tried to re-enact Russia’s social media activity in 2016 as a turbulence agent for equality violators and claimed Trump and his associates during their campaign. he was completely vindicated, although Mueller said he could not vindicate the President.


Source link