GM suing Fiat Chrysler in November on the alleged corruption union bargaining, a lawsuit was later fired albeit one thing so far refused to die. Things have spicier last week when GM says FCA has a “mole” inside GM. Today, the FCA said GM’s allegations “will make John Le Carré cringe.”
The documents were filed in response to GM’s request to US County Judge Paul Borman to reinstate the lawsuit last week, and also talk about the “mole” and other foreign bank accounts that GM gives. know they’ve found out since the original complaint was filed. That complaint alleges that the FCA sabotaged GM’s contract negotiations with the UAW, thereby giving FCA a competitive advantage in the form of lower labor costs.
The FCA denied GM’s full version of the event, but the new “mole” allegations have sparked ridicule. The most important part of legal documents filed today:
GM’s proposed amendment complaint reads like a script from a third-degree spy movie, filled with irrational allegations that the FCA has paid not one but two, “mole[s]”To” intrude GM “and” funnel internal information to [FCA]”Use of money” stored “in a” vast network “of” secrets abroad [bank] account. ”(Moves 2, 5, 7-8, 20- 21.) Neither is true. GM has extended its attacks to every FCA officer and employee, making extravagant accusations against them without the slightest amount of practical support, is despicable.
In addition to making up a baseless story about “corporate espionage” that would upset John Le Carré (Motion 21), GM (i) sought to rebuild the standard of “raw. (ii) misrepresent the governing legal standard left for modification after the judgment has been issued, and (iii) accuse the Court of “apparent error” clear “by dismissing the Complaint without giving the GM leave to amend, even though GM spent two years drafting the original complaint and not previously asking for the amendment to leave. GM is wrong in every way.
This proposal is the latest example of the time GM was preparing to attack the FCA, accusing the Court of misconduct in the process. GM’s fictitious account of “corporate espionage” was based entirely on two insignificant allegations:
1. FCA – a Dutch corporation headquartered in the UK, with its subsidiaries operating facilities in Italy and more than 40 other countries, and selling to customers in more than 130 countries – maintain “foreign bank accounts” in “countries like Switzerland, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Italy, Singapore, Cayman Islands, and others. ”(Motion 5.) That is insignificant, and certainly not illegal.
2. Certain individuals – such as Alphons Iacobelli (whom GM hired without asking FCA for reference information after his work was temporarily terminated by the FCA) and Joseph Ashton (a former official The UAW has served on GM’s Board of Directors and is not affiliated with the FCA) —Also holds or controls bank accounts in certain countries. (AC ¶ 35, 43.) Even if it is true, it is not illegal.
Based only on “existence of.” [these] foreign bank accounts ”(Karis Decl. ¶ 10), GM came to the bold conclusion, on which they were based solely on” information and belief “, that Iacobelli and Ashton were”[s]”Payed for by the FCA through” secrecy overseas [bank] account “to” intrusion GM, “” hopper internal information to [FCA], ”And ensures that neither benefits nor concessions provided by the UAW to the FCA are provided to GM. (Movements 2, 5, 7-8, 20-21.) No facts are alleged in the proposed revised Complaint – none of the facts – support the speculative charge This outrageous.
GM released the following statement on Monday in response to FCA’s response, via Car News:
GM said in a statement: “The FCA’s corruption in the collective bargaining process remains undeniable – a federal investigation is underway and there have been many pleading guilty.” “The new truth uncovered through GM’s investigation that the FCA attempts to discount – including foreign accounts in many countries – concerns many individuals and makes GM’s RICO incident even stronger. stronger. GM sought to expose in court all the harm that the FCA bribe scheme did to GM. “
GM did not say anything in the FCA’s responses “denying the importance of these allegations and the direct harm that the defendants’ corruption has inflicted on GM, and the Court should revise the judgment in advance.” and reinstate our case. “
Everything is getting a little complicated, but what would this look like when both sides have seemingly unlimited amounts of money to spend on lawyers, apart from all the time in the world. Borman, person was very tired with this case, capable of making a quick ruling on GM’s reinstatement request, but who can tell where the case started.
You can read all of FCA’s responses below.