Back in June, Facebook launched one New feature that tells it mobile application users if an article they about to share is more three months old. While the user does not prevent from sharing an older article, Facebook said at the time tries to get people to stop and think about what they’re about to share – so hopefully the user will actually read the article and analyze if it’s from a legitimate source or if it’s provides the most up-to-date information on a given topic or event.
Now Facebook is going one step further. David Gillis, a designer at Facebook, tweeted that Social media company is change that notice to include information about the source of the link, when the site was first registered, and when the article was first shared on Facebook. Also, if the post has any information regarding covid-19, will also have a link to a cThe ovid-19 website is managed by Facebook.
However, if the user shares information from a trusted medical authority, like World Health Organization, they will not receive notification. Based on FacebookThis is to “make sure people have access to reliable information about covid-19 from global health agencies. ”
The list when a website is first registered is designed to help slow down the spread of misinformation, but if someone does not understand the relevance of that registration date, It won’t be as helpful. Domain age is one of the deciding factors for a website ‘Trusted, but doesn’t really read the text, checks for backlinks and delves into the origins, the domain age itself doesn’t make much sense.
Furthermore, some users may be confused timeframe “registered” with the original publication date of the article or confusing the date “first shared” with the date of original publication.
Have Many websites exploit long-standing, rewritten news stories they have little or no credit or confirm the original publication date from origin, and then publish—All for the sake of the stirrercontroversial. Those stories can go viral on Facebook, and I’m not sure including the source link or the domain age will help stop the spread.
There are also cases where “news” or “opinion” websites also maintain a Facebook page, which violates Facebook’s rules for sharing sponsored or paid partner content. In short, the sharing of sponsored content must be disclosed to Facebook users, and the content can only be considered sponsored if the creator is paid to do something to promote the brand. term. A news store cannot pay another news store to share news stories on their Facebook page and call it a “paid partnership”. This recently happened to the Mad World News Facebook page, which has been downgraded.
What could be helpful in restraint the spread of disinformation online is if any of the algorithms Facebook is using to generate these messages are disqualified.that is page to see if it quotes What is that origin and origin. “This news story originally came from publication X or Y ” is easier to understand and more useful over age region, especially if the site reporting it is a newer site But publishing is legitimate and still has some way to build some influence.
Or, you know, every oneone can actually read Facebook tips page on how to spot a fake news story, which actually has good strategies on how to properly analyze the news source.