As the Americans waited for the final voting results and Joe Biden took a lead ahead of President Trump on Wednesday night, several analysts voted Liberal in key states as a potential help for the Democratic Party candidate.
As of Wednesday afternoon, the lesser-known psychologist and Liberal presidential candidate Jo Jorgensen had garnered 1.58 million votes – far beyond other third-party hopes. She also received the second highest number of votes in the party’s 49-year history, according to Reason magazine. And Jorgensen appears to be beating the Trump-Biden profits in the battlefield states of Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin as mail ballots continue to be tabled.
THE RESULTS OF THE PRESIDENT
“In this election, Liberal voters could have turned the Electoral College at least 22 votes by supporting Trump in the battlefield states of Wisconsin, Michigan and Nevada. By throwing away their votes, they have the potential to be a spoiler to Trump̵7;s reelection efforts, ”political strategist Ryan Cassin, CEO of Beast Digital, told Fox News.
As of the end of Wednesday, former Vice President Biden is said to have secured Wisconsin with 49.6% compared to Trump’s 49%, and Jorgensen came in third with just under 1%. In Michigan, Biden stands at 49.8%, 48.7% higher than Trump and Jorgenson again at 1%. Similarly, in the highly controversial Nevada, Biden won 49.2% compared with Trump’s 48.6%, with the Liberal Party (LP) accounting for 1.4%.
“In Wisconsin’s tightest race, Freedom candidate Jo Jorgensen got 38,414 votes, about 1% of the usual votes they usually do. This is more than 21,000 votes that Democrat Joe Biden has won in this race, ”noted global risk analyst Dennis Santiago. “Wisconsin is crucial for Republican Donald Trump to win re-election. In the 2020 races, where the traumatic artifacts of a deeply divided nation split the main parties’ vote so tightly, the Liberal vote will win.
Third party candidates can be viewed as taking the votes from the two major parties. While liberal ideologies focus on small government, low taxes, extensive use of guns, and freedom of the individual can be strongly correlated and in conflict with Democrats and GOPs, the meaning of liberty is historically more closely related to the red faction. Ron and Rand Paul and the Tea Party movement reinforce their own brand of Liberalism.
ELECTION 2020: PARTY IN THE FIRST INDEPENDENT NATIONAL COMPETITION
Although not recognized by name, Jorgensen – an Illinois native and the party’s first female presidential candidate – achieved a vote of as high as 4% in Tuesday’s election.
Jorgensen’s campaign website, with the slogan, “Generations of Republican and Democratic politicians have failed the American people,” has historically criticized the “26 thousand debt. billion dollars “,” constantly participating in the costly and deadly foreign war “and” skyrocketing health care costs “.
That push, however, could be exactly what Biden needed to win, opening up the contradiction of liberalism.
“The tragedy of wasting votes on hopeless candidates is that instead of finding someone who agrees with you on 80 percent of the issue, you run the risk of getting someone who disagrees with you on almost everything, Cassin surmised. “By 2020, that means the threat from the Supreme Court packing, halting our economic recovery, reversing decades of work to achieve energy independence, and leaving America’s most free senator away from the presidency. ”
Santiago agrees that “there is a lot of irony noting that 1% of the Liberal’s vote on it could put many of their core values at risk when a founding Democratic chairman returns to the White House. . “
“Tactically, they will be on an agenda to oppose gun control, taxes and better socialize health care by helping Trump stay in office,” he said.
But Scott Sobel, Washington-based senior vice president of crisis and communications litigation, warned in advance that the LP had undermined the value of the GOP.
“The fact is, it’s hard if not impossible to make general comment on whether a third-party voter would choose Trump or Biden if they didn’t have, for example, a Liberal option in this 2020 election ”.
Sobel also emphasized that not all Liberals line up for tax or health care with Republican candidates.
“Republicans today are called President Trump’s party because conservative Republicans from previous years would disagree with deficit spending backed by Trump and Republicans,” he said. “So was the Republican Party that supported social programs in the past.”
CLICK HERE TO GET FOX NEWS APP
And on the future of Liberalism, Santiago speculates that a small but important subset of voting will become even more important in the future.
“The Liberal Party is not popularized by the rough vote. They get their 1% reliably. Nothing has changed there. What has changed is that their meager 1% now has a much bigger effect on the outcome of the larger election, ”he added. “Their small numbers have a high leverage. That means their agendas have new power to be found on the national arena. I expect that the major parties will pay even more attention to reaching the Liberals as allies in the future. “