Dodgers third wheel Justin Turner join the team’s celebration despite the fact that he did tested positive for COVID-19. Turner defied team and tournament duties to remain isolated and joined the Dodgers on the pitch, hold the trophy and pose for a photo without wearing a mask. “data-reacttid =” 16 “> At the end of the world series on Tuesday night, the Dodgers third-place runner Justin Turner joined the team’s celebration despite the fact that he had Results positive for COVID-19. Turner defied team and tournament duties to maintain isolation, and joined the Dodgers on the field, holding the trophy and posing for a photo without a mask.
While Turner had been around his teammates for a few innings before being dragged into the match and hours, if not days, before Game 6, it was theoretically still possible he had been contagious. to someone on the field that night.
Hence, this raises the question of liability. If someone infected with COVID-19 intentionally interacts with another person, do those people have any reason to file a lawsuit against that person?
During the pandemic, lawyers have argued that is unlikely. “It is very difficult to prove cause in cases of transmission,” said Gregory Keating of USC’s Gould School of Law. Sexually transmitted diseases are an exception, but to date, Keating added, “COVID-19 has been consistent with the normal case.”
Without a trace of continuous and comprehensive exposure in a boiling environment, it would be difficult to demonstrate that a specifically infected individual is responsible for infecting others. While certain mass gatherings over the past few months are considered “super contagious” events, the specific individuals responsible for the spread of the infectious disease are often not identified.
A more reasonable angle of prosecution where an individual disregards typical safety procedures may be problematic.
“The torture of the battery covers is ‘bothersome’ as well as ‘harmful’,” said Keating. “Touching others when you know you have a dangerous, highly contagious and potentially infectious disease is an act of contact that the jury is most likely to consider ‘insulting’.”
obtained by Politico. “Threats or attempts to use COVID-19 as a weapon against the Americans will not be tolerated.” “Data-reacttid =” 28 “>” Because Coronavirus seems to meet the statutory definition of ‘biological agent’ … such behavior may be related to Terrorism-related Acts of the State, “Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen wrote in a memorandum obtained by Politico.” Threats or attempts to use COVID-19 as a weapon against the Americans will not be tolerated. “
Intent is key here, and someone like Turner – whose main intention is to celebrate, not be infectious – likely won’t face prosecution from the Justice Department.
Complaint tracker COVID-19 Developed by the law firm Hunton Andrews Kurth indicates that as of October 29, there have been 5,852 complaints related to COVID-19. The most common types of complaints are insurance-related or civil rights-related, such as demonstrations against masked duty. “data-reacttid =” 41 “> All of this doesn’t mean that COVID infections don’t generate a bunch of legitimate activity. A COVID-19 complaint tracker developed by law firm Hunton Andrews Kurth points out that as of October 29, 5,852 complaints have been filed regarding COVID-19. The most common types of claims are insurance-related or civil rights-related, such as protests. against masked missions.
However, cases of personal injury arising from COVID infection would be extremely difficult to win given the simple fact that in the midst of a pandemic, infection can come from any direction.
Writes David Goguen, editor of Nolo, a legal website focused on consumers. “Threatening the general public cannot form the basis for a personal injury lawsuit and then cannot prove that one person actually caused illness in the midst of a pandemic. this “. “data-reacttid =” 43 “>” In the context of a possible lawsuit due to coronavirus infection, establishing liability for personal injury would require proof that a person is identifiable. [the defendant] actually passed the disease on to another identifiable person [the plaintiff] – merely fear David Goguen, editor of Nolo, a consumer-focused legal website, writes. “Threatening the general public cannot form the basis for a personal injury lawsuit and then cannot prove that one person actually caused illness in the midst of a pandemic. this “.